This entry was posted on Friday, September 3rd, 2010 at 7:58am and is filed under Food Safety, Meat, Agriculture, Health. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
The recent recall of commercial eggs has led to lots of questions about food safety. Unprecedented numbers of people, many of them new to farmer’s markets, are flocking (pardon the pun) to purchase eggs that they believe to be safer than those in the grocery store. But there are some missing pieces in the search for “clean and safe food”; it’s not as simple as “buy fresh, buy local”
As Americans have become further removed from their food supply, they have lost touch with the fact that food is a biological product, produced in biological situations from biological animals that have biological functions. Translation: everything poops. We have gotten so used to our food being sterilized that we have forgotten about basic food safety. I also happen to believe that because we are not exposed to low levels of normally occuring bacteria as we grow up, when we do encounter these normal bugs, they give us a pathogenic reaction.
ALL foods are subject to ‘conatimination’. Salmonella occurs in all birds and reptiles. It is usually not a pathogenic strain, but it is still there. Similarly, various strains of E. coli are present in every bit of feces. Pastuerization, irradiation, buying direct from a farmer you trust; none of these are substitutes for basic food safety.
Do I think eggs and ground beef are safer if you buy them from a local source that you can trust? Generally, yes. However, even the cleanest hen house will still produce eggs with salmonella on the outside. Even single-animal, small plant, grass-fed ground beef can harbor E. coli. So, follow basic food safety guidelines: Separate preparation areas and utensils between raw items and cooked. Refrigerate food quickly after cooking, etc. etc.
If you want to read more, search our Food Safety archives, or check out these posts:
http://downtoearthblog.com/agriculture/is-local-food-safer-or-just-more-accountable/archives/184
http://downtoearthblog.com/foodproduction/no-need-to-avoid-beef-if-you-know-its-source/archives/211
http://downtoearthblog.com/health/teaching-children-about-food-safety/archives/163

February 17th, 2011 at 10:02am
“However, even the cleanest hen house will still produce eggs with salmonella on the outside”
While external contamination of an egg by Salmonella spp. is a potential source of zoonotic infection, the yolk is a common source of infection. Salmonella spp. are transmitted trans-ovarian in the hen to the yolk of a developing egg. Hygine of the egg plays no role in affecting trans-ovarian transmission. Proper cooking will eliminate an infected yolk as a source of infection.
You did a good job of explaining that there are normal flora E. coli isolates that don’t cause disease. In fact, many of the organisms in a chicken or cows feces are host-adapted and probably wouldn’t cause disease in a healthy human.
Matt
February 18th, 2011 at 8:19am
Thanks Matt. That really makes me think that the health (translating to ability to resist Salmonella) of the chicken is important, as is the cleanliness of the environment.
Stress, such as is experienced in most modern production systems, is a huge factor in disease resistance.